Skip to content

Stars-above-Westeros

this is just another blog about a song of ice and fire

  • Home
  • 2020

Year: 2020

The future Lord Frey

Posted on November 20, 2020August 9, 2023 By lateandlazybutterfly
A Frey Theory

To summarize this theory, Big Walder Frey has a plan (though it might not be entirely his own) to become the future Lord Frey. This plan is not entirely stupid or unrealistic and encapsulated in one word -marriage. The many Freys who are further ahead in line of inheritance are not his competition, only one of them truly is (or rather was) -Little Walder Frey.

Big Walder Freys great ambition:

 “We’re cousins, not brothers” added Big Walder, the little one. “I’m Walder, son of Jammos. My father was Lord Walder’s son by his fourth wife. He’s Walder son of Merrett. His grandmother was Lord Walder’s third wife, the Crakehall. He’s ahead of me in line of succession even though I`m older”.

“Only by fifty-two days”, Little Walder objected.” And neither of us will ever hold the twins, stupid”.

“I will”, Big Walder declared. “And we’re not the only Walders either. Ser Stevron has a grandson Black Walder, he’s fourth in line of succession, and there is Red Walder, Ser Emmon’s son, and Bastard Walder, who isn’t in the line at all. He’s called Walder Rivers, not Walder Frey. Plus, there’s girls named Walda.”

-Bran I ACOK

This sure seems like a big ambition for one small boy, though young boys in general are not known for realism.

When considering most of what we have observed of him, he seems to be the more intelligent of the young Frey boys. He’s also not as overtly brutish as Little Walder, or at the very least much better at concealing this aspect of his personality and befriending other people. His reactions to the death of his relatives and other people seem cold and apathic, to be sure. It seems strange that He’s the one proclaiming his determined intent to be the next Lord Frey, when childlike and socially inappropriate boasts like this seem to align more with Little Walder’s character.

Is there any chance he could murder his way to lordship?

Killing so many Freys, most of which are older and more experienced, may either require extraordinary skill, superpowers or an army. Or at the very least, the vast amount of money necessary to hire an assassin of some skill. For a family this large an army of assassins might be more appropriate.

Big Walder cannot expect to have any of these. And even if he had the means to murder all his relatives, he’d run into a logistical problem, the same problem that UnCat or Arya would run into if they were to try some Frey mass murder the way ShowArya did.

Simply put, House Frey is extremely large and far spread and it is almost impossible to get them all to be in the same place at any point in time. First there’s Emmon Frey and his progeny who have moved in with House Lannister in the Westerlands. Still, they might visit occasionally. We also know of an outlaw named Aegon Frey -good luck tracking that one down. The children of Garemy Frey are fostered in the vale. It is of course common practice to send one’s son to be fostered with another house, so we must assume that several young Frey boys are out of the house at any point in time. Then there’re boys in training to become septons or maesters that might not yet have sworn their vows. There are at least two Freys in Bravos. And where the hell is Alesander the singer. Has anybody seen him?

(I actually have a guilty pleasure theory that Alesander Frey was actually Symon Silvertongue. It is very common for singers to choose an artist name. And as House Frey was allied with Robb when he first appeared in King’s Landing, it would have been important to hide his identity. Then there is the fact that Alesanders father was named Symond and that character is associated with silver coins. In this case, Tyrion would have unknowingly started the beloved tradition of turning Freys into supper. Off topic -sorry)

And all the aforementioned are ahead of Big Walder in line of inheritance. If he plans to kill them one by one when they claim their inheritance, he’s going to be busy for a long while.

If Frey-mass murder isn’t an option, what else could he do?

There is a strange oversight in Big Walders count of Freys – and that is all the women in line of inheritance. Now to be fair, GRRM himself has stated that the rules of inheritance in Westeros are often unclear, and therefore the cause of much conflict.

“Well, the short answer is that the laws of inheritance in the Seven Kingdoms are modeled on those in real medieval history… which is to say, they were vague, uncodified, subject to varying interpretations, and often contradictory.”

A man’s eldest son was his heir. After that the next eldest son. Then the next, etc. Daughters were not considered while there was a living son, except in Dorne, where females had equal right of inheritance according to age.

After the sons, most would say that the eldest daughter is next in line. But there might be an argument from the dead man’s brothers, say. Does a male sibling or a female child take precedence? Each side has a “claim.”

What if there are no children, only grandchildren and great grandchildren? Is precedence or proximity the more important principle? Do bastards have any rights? What about bastards who have been legitimized, do they go in at the end after the trueborn kids, or according to birth order? What about widows? And what about the will of the deceased? Can a lord disinherit one son, and name a younger son as heir? Or even a bastard?

There are no clear cut answers, either in Westeros or in real medieval history. Things were often decided on a case by case basis. A case might set a precedent for later cases… but as often as not, the precedents conflicted as much as the claims.

GRRM, SSM 1999

And this:

“A daughter comes before an uncle too. If her brother is dead Karhold belongs to Lady Alys.”

-Jon X ADWD

We are shown repeatedly that daughters can inherit according to Andal traditions, as we meet a number of Lady’s ruling in their own right such as Anya Waynwood and Arwyn Oakheart, both of whom have adult sons. When you consider the fact that women, or descendants of the female line may be able to inherit, the top ten list of potential claimants to the twins by the end of ADWD could look like this:

1. Edwyn Frey – son of Ryman the hanged

2. Walda Frey -Edwyn‘s daughter -a girl of nine or ten

3. Black Walder Frey -Edwyn’s notorious younger brother

4. Perra Frey -daughter of the deceased Petyr Pimple –a girl of four or five

5. Walton Frey – third son of Stevron Frey

6. Steffon Frey -Walton’s son

7. Bryan Frey -Walton’s son

8. Fair Walda Frey -Walton’s daughter

9. Patrek Vance -son of Maegelle, Stevron’s daughter

10.Walder Vance -son of Maegelle, Stevrons daughter

Edwyn, the heir has exactly one daughter, but no son. We do not know why this is the case, maybe there are fertility issues, maybe his wife doesn’t want to look at his constipated face anymore, and maybe some of his kin secretly give them some contraceptive medication (I wouldn’t put it past them). But as nine years is larger than the usual age difference between siblings, some of his relatives might bet on Walda remaining an only child.

Based on all that we know it is conceivable for Walda Frey to inherit before Black Walder Frey. For the rest of the text I’ll refer to this girl as Walda the heiress (though technically she’s the heir’s heiress but that’s a tad too long) to differentiate her from all the other Waldas.

There are a several reasons why Big Walder might have made this big oversight:

1. The rules of inheritance are complicated, and he is a young boy with an incomplete education, so he simply does not know. Considering the very misogynistic society that he was raised in; it might seem logical to him that women do not inherit. Then again, someone as obsessed with the line of inheritance as this boy would probably figure it out.

2. He knows, but thinks that Black Walder will just kill Walda alongside her father as she is a weak young girl. Or he believes that the Frey’s will ignore the claim of any girl heiress anyway, because misogyny. This is another assumption that some would make, but it also carries an inherent oversight -Black Walder may have a formidable reputation, but he is only one guy and the Frey’s are many. Plus, there are household guards -I assume.

If you were a random member of house Frey, that is not completely braindead, who would you want to rule–the notoriously violent and unpleasant Black Walder Frey or a young girl who might feel indebted to you for your assistance. If Edwyn Frey dies Black Walder will probably be the prime suspect and he is not well liked by his kin.

3. He knows that Walda Frey will probably inherit the twins someday, but he does not want Little Walder Frey to catch on to this. Because it would give his plan away …and also because Little Walder might be his biggest competition.

Which heir would the old Lord prefer?

Another factor we must consider is the intra-house politics of house Frey. The line of inheritance is a big concern for most Freys, especially the old Lord Frey himself. He might not like to think about his demise, but he invested a lot of time in instructing his former heir Stevron on the value of family.

His father was querulous and stubborn, with an iron will and a wasp’s tongue, but he did believe in taking care of his own. All of his own, even the ones who had disappointed and displeased him. Even the ones whose names he couldn’t remember. Once he was gone, though …

When Ser Stevron had been heir, that was one thing. The old man had been grooming Stevron for sixty years, and had pounded it into his head that blood was blood. -ASOS, Merrett

It seems therefore likely that the old man himself has a marked interest in who Walda the heiress’s future husband might be, as they have a good chance at being his eventual successor. And arranging advantageous marriages for his progeny always was something of a hobby for him, anyway. If so, what factors would old Walder Frey consider when he is looking at his young great-great-granddaughter’s potential suitors:

– The creation of lasting political bonds is usually the primary concern when Westerosi nobles marry. Alliances with their neighboring Lords or Liege Lords are important, but marriages that create unity within their own houses also occur regularly. And Old Walder Frey must contend with a great deal of intra-house rivalry due to the sheer number of his offspring. It should really be his priority to end or at least limit this conflict. So, arranging a marriage between some branches of house Frey could be a really good idea.

– What age should they be? I have very little doubt that Walder Frey would marry any of his progeny to a 200-hundred-year-old soul-sucking Lich if he thought this would be helpful to his lineage, but he doesn’t have to do so here. There is no lack of young Frey boys, so he can afford to pick one of the appropriate age. That means that all boys between the age of eight and twelve are prime candidates.

– The schmooze factor. Old Lord Walder could be little bit vain. So, all the Frey’s who name their sons Walder might know what they’re doing. The idea that both the future Lord and Lady Frey are of his blood (and named Walder and Walda) might also appeal to him. Considering the old man’s opinion of Hoster Tully, the poor boy named Hoster Frey might no longer be a candidate for the same reason, though.

– Personal merit, skills and connections. As the most appropriate suitors are very young, it is probably too soon to say much about their talents. Connections are usually built by fostering children with powerful houses, though. The old Lord Frey tried to foster the two Walder Freys with Lord Arryn before fostering them with house Stark. And at that point he was still honest about the alliance. This means that he very much wanted Big Walder and Little Walder to have powerful friends. While it could be said that he is an ambitious and family-oriented man who will try to get the best deal for all of his offspring, it could also mean that he has a marked interest in the upbringing of these two.

We are told that the members of house Frey mostly only trust their full brothers and maybe their full nephews. Old Walder must pay attention to these allegiances if he truly wants to create unity within his house via marriage. So, we can divide house Frey into factions based on which of Walder Freys marriages they were born to, and we may be able to guess which of these factions would be the most useful to the future Lady Frey:

The Royce-Frey faction would include all of Old Walder Freys numerous descendants by his first wife Perra Royce. While this faction is large, it is also the most divided as Emmon and his sons live at Casterly Rock and Edwyn and Black Walder want each other dead. Even though this is Walda the heiress’s own faction it might not be an entirely bad idea to create some unifying bonds within this group.

The Swann-Frey faction. The second Lady Frey only bore two sons, a septon and a pie. Jared the pie didn’t have a lot of children and some of his progeny got axed at the red wedding. This branch is likely too small and unlucky to make good allies.

The Crakehall-Frey branch is the largest, with seven children being born, and all of them having their own kids too. Their Crakehall blood makes them notoriously tough and strong. Hosteen the best Frey warrior is likely the leader of this group. They’d probably be one of the most useful Frey factions. Little Walder Frey is from this branch.

The Blackwood-Freys are likely led by Lame Lothar Frey, castellan of the twins and by most accounts the most ruthless and cunning of this family. He arranged and planned the Red Wedding. Strangely enough, none of the beneficial marriages that take place after the defeat of the Young Wolf include members of his group, though we must assume that Lame Lothar would be able to demand some reward of his father. Big Walder Frey, son of Jammos, is of this branch. If he has any allies or co-conspirators in his plan to become Lord Frey, they’d be found here.

The Rosby-Freys are mostly young adults and therefore a relatively small faction (that includes Roslin).  None of them is close in age to Walda the Heiress. This faction includes some of the nicest Frey’s, some of whom are shown to have sympathies towards house Stark. Not something old Walder would consider to be ideal.

The Farring-Freys are children and therefore likely need support themselves. Furthermore, there are rumors that they may have been fathered by Black Walder and one of them is his squire. It is very possible that they would support Black Walder and not Walda the Heiress.

So Big Walder and Little Walder may very well have been the finalists of the Bachelorette, essentially. They tick more boxes than any other candidate.

Considering Big Walders youth it is entirely possible that he didn’t come up with this plan by himself, and if anybody helped him, it would have been Lame Lothar, his uncle. It just so happens Lame Lothar has four daughters, but no son who could marry the heiress. If he wanted to secure control of the twins for himself or his next of kin, helping Big Walder become the husband of Walda the heiress and therefor the next Lord of the twins would be in his best interest. He is also a notorious schemer who may very well be encouraging the rivalry between Edwyn and Black Walder. Should one of them die, the other could feasibly be tried for murder, and he could then rule through his young, indebted nephew and his bride. As castellan of the twins, he is in a very powerful position, too. He will be amongst the first to hear of the old Lord’s death and may therefore able to put his preferred successor into place.

And that might be Big Walder’s plan on how to become the next Lord Frey. It might also be his motive for killing Little Walder.

As a smart boy, he may have realized how suspicious Lord Manderly is acting. Most people present, did. And if that fat Lord turns out to be a traitor, the betrothal between Little Walder and Wylla Manderly is likely to be broken, making him the clueless chief competitor for Big Walder, once more.

Put alas, Little Walder was conveniently murdered, and now Big Walder (who is totally not the prime suspect) has to do only one thing: get the hell out of the north.

And one more GoT review…

Posted on May 14, 2020August 9, 2023 By lateandlazybutterfly
Another review of the show ending

Because every fan blogger has to have an opinion on this.

The Game of Thrones finale. There must be something wrong-and it cannot just be bad writing.

It might not come as a surprise to anyone who is a part of the Song of Ice and Fire fandom that I have watched the finale of the show -and I got issues with it. Even a year later I still do. The internet is full of opinions and critique regarding the ending of the show, and the miserable implications that it carries for the books that might yet be released someday, and with this entry it’s even fuller.

While there are many things to be said about those final seasons I won’t bother with most of them. In my humble opinion there are two issues I cannot rationalize away with bad writing or budget and timeline problems. What the hell is up with that creepy King Bran and where is the bittersweet ending we were promised–because try as I might I can only interpret it as a bitterokay ending. The latter however is very subjective so I will not discuss it here and just focus on Bran.

What the hell is going on with Bran??

There is so much that feels wrong about this King Bran that I don’t even know where to begin, so let’s start with his election and how it does not fit with most of the world building done in the books.

While I believe that a peaceful election of a new king at the end of the series was the most realistic part of the finale (the background lore is already there) this Great council that they have given us is definitely the low budget version. There should be hundreds of lordlings, all of whom would want to have an input. This council is not only small, but it is also has an unusually large number of Starks. Who the hell gave three votes to the north, but only one to Dorne and the Iron Islands. Maybe this is meant to imply that the north will be in a powerful position at the end of ADoS, but it is still weird.

And what exactly is Davos Seaworth even the lord of. I remember book Stannis giving him some important title, but I’m also pretty sure some other lord (enemy of Stannis) was still sitting on that spot. He doesn’t seem to be powerful enough to belong to that small and eclectic selection of nobles.

Who the hell named Sam Tarly as Grand Maester. Two episodes ago he was a citadel drop out stuck in the north. Did Jon Snow just sit a decade in that dungeon waiting for his trial? Oh, nevermind, it is Sam Tarly…He probably just stole the Bossmaester’s robes so he could help his friend with his difficult trial. The real Grand Maester is now out there somewhere naked trying to get home.

We also have to consider that Bran Stark will probably still be a minor by the end of the series (under 16 years old) especially when we take int account the aborted five-year gap. And yes – we have had several underaged rulers in this series, so it is not impossible, but I should think that after years of war the present nobles may not want another untested youth in a position of power.

Great achievements or great Charisma could overcome the obstacle of Bran’s youth and the lack thereof is my point. Bran sits in his chair all day and talks to no one. His own family is put off by his strange and ominous comments (I may have to list them one day, but I would have to rewatch the show to do that). His only friend Meera Reed has ditched him because she thought he wasn’t himself anymore. Clearly he is the epitome of a charismatic and inspiring leader (not). If Bran were to inherit a title, this wouldn’t matter so much but for him to achieve a majority vote in an election…his social skills are vital (or at least they should be).

And as for his achievements -well who is this three eyed raven exactly and why should anyone care. It is important to note that most Westerosi nobles have been raised by their Maesters to be rational and critical thinkers and therefor will not believe in the existence of the others until they are beheaded by them. And as most southron armies have not contributed in the battles against the undead, most southron Lords will not believe that there ever was a threat. They would likely consider it political propaganda or believe the night king to have been an especially fearsome wildling chieftain.

As for his supposed supernatural powers, that is an even worse argument. You may remember that the faith of the seven is very strong in the south. While the show has somehow killed the entire religious uprising in one explosion, I doubt it will be that simple in the books. Many of the more pious citizens really don’t like any hint of sorcery or any other strange power. As a consequence of this, Tyrion’s entire speech would have turned many nobles against Bran.

Brand achieved nothing that could in any way be observed by anyone…so why on earth would anyone believe it.

Tyrion himself is the next issue. Like him or not, he is one of the most infamous characters in all of Westeros and widely considered to be untrustworthy. His vote of confidence for Bran should not be helpful at all. Choosing him as Hand of the King is also political suicide. (Though Tyrion still wants it very much, just like Bran obviously wants/plans to be King. They are both liars.)

It is also very questionable how many Lords would answer the summons to Great Council issued by foreign invaders who only recently had a kill all prisoners policy. Those few Lords present in that scene may well be the only ones willing to come, and most of them have strong connections to either Jon or Dany. If so, any ruler elected here would widely remain unacknowledged. And no matter how funny it may seem, Edmure Tully is a much better candidate than Bran. He is not too young and very mellow and kind. In conclusion, any election of Brandon Stark would have to include a lot of shady behind-the-scenes deals and some political strong-arming by his northern supporters. And once the north gains independence, he’d lose most of his support.

My next point is of course Bran’s overall suspicious demeanor and dialogue. Even if the showrunners had given him a wheelchair bumper that reads Bad guy Rollz, a mustache to twirl and random surges of cackling laughter- they really couldn’t give the audience any more hints that this is not supposed to be a good guy or even a halfway decent one. This might even imply a Sauron wins scenario for the series. There is something very shady going on with that character, and the showrunners refuse to spell it out to us. And if that’s the case here, where would that lead us.

For most of the story, it was always our own characters and their failures and mistakes that drove the entire plot. First there’s child-defenestrator-Jaime, that is followed by war-catalyst-Catelyn, then the-righteous-ruler-must-rule-regardless-of-consequences-for-the-stability-of-the-realm-or-safety-of-family-Ned.  And that’s just the first book. As readers or viewers, we might be inclined to perceive the characters as villains and hero’s, depending on how much we like them or emphasize with them. We are biased. It is however also possible that they are meant to be flawed characters with conflicted hearts who are at the heart of the conflict because they create that very conflict. (That sentence took longer than it should).

With that thought in mind it makes sense for Dany to be revealed as some type of a tragic, destructive antagonist (though it wasn’t that much of a revelation but I won’t go into that here) who in some form symbolizes the fire (desire) in ice and fire. We do have a problem though because if one of our main characters so obviously represents the destructive nature of humanity with a whole lot of fire it means that another must represent the destruction through ice. Balance and equal representation and all that. Regardless of his name Jon Snow is not a good candidate for destruction through ice as he’s not been shown to be particularly hateful or coldly calculating and hasn’t done anything that looks like large scale destruction/horror/evil (though he has his share of screw-ups too). Also, the entire point of his secret heritage is that he’s fire and ice both. And that probably leads us to Bran. How could the noble King Bran Stark be an enormously flawed and large scale destructive figure in this story? Well lets gather the facts.

1. The show has revealed to us that the others were created by the children of the forest, likely as a weapon of mass destruction against humanity. This information is never mentioned again and leads nowhere. This is either very bad writing or a very suspicious omission.

2. If the children of the forest created something as dangerous as the others, they should logically have the means to control them.

3. The children of the forest are notorious for their skinchangeing abilities. Skinchangeing/warging is essentially mind control. Would they also be able to control magical or dead things this way -that is unknown.

4. In a series that is defined by complicated characters with complicated motives, the others seem to have neither of these things. If they were only ever meant to be a weapon or tool controlled by another faction, this would make sense.

5. Bran Stark might be the most powerful warg ever.

6. The show has shown that Bran can control another body even if it exists at another point in time. Poor Hodor. Timey-whimeyness has therefore been confirmed in Asoiaf (like it or not). Once more the show does nothing with this ability though the implications of Bran controlling any body at any point in history could be massive.

7. Bran Stark is willing and able to take control over the body of another person. He is not limited to his own broken body. He will rationalize and justify it to himself as borrowing.

8. Bran Stark is a sad and bitter child, who likely has the power to watch his family die across the continent and timeline. No clear consequences to that have ever been shown. And there should definitely be consequences to that.

9. At least in the books Bran Stark is still a child that believes in fairytales and has a limited understanding of adult thought processes and politics. Considering the timeline of Asoiaf without the five-year gap and the fact that Bran is in a cave far away from most normal human interactions, this may never change, at least not within the timeframe of the series.

10. Bran Stark always wanted to be a knight and the hero of a story. His chapters in the books show him to be very aware of his own social status. There are some clear indications in the last episode that reveal him as someone who desires wordly power no matter how distant he seems to be.

If Brans story was truly designed to mislead the audience, then the divergence must have already begun as far back as the Hodor moment. No—I don’t mean door holding and the timey-whimey-warg-thing—those parts can stay. It’s the conflict that makes little sense within the context of my theory.

– If the others are warg-directed-tools with no agency of their own, they obviously would not be attacking Bran or the children of the forest.

-If any version of Bran, at any point in time, was controlling the others, at this point in time, he’d never harm Summer or Hodor. That makes no sense.

-Alternatively, the others, or at least their leader, may have gained or regained some form of independence or free will and are now pursuing those who controlled them, once. The situation would then resemble a slave revolt. Of course, they would seek to destroy the remnants of the children of the forest and all those who aid them, especially if it is a warg. Though this begs the question of why now. Why would they have been inactive for such a long time? Maybe they react to increased activity of the children of the forest. Or maybe they know that Bran is powerful enough to re-enslave them. That does not explain why they would hound the wildlings, or why they are building a massive army, though. It’s possible they’d try to grab some land of their own, but then again -why now.

– If neither option applies, then it is possible that the others are being controlled by the children or Bloodraven, but why would they attack Hodor. Well, first we’d have to know why the children would want Bran, or Bloodraven for that matter, to come to them. I may have some ideas:

1. The children of the forest are a dying species. Because of humanity.

2.The creation of the others was a desperate last attempt to defeat mankind. Without the others, they would not stand a chance.

3. Wargs are rare, powerful wargs are rarer. Even amongst the CotF.

4. If the overall population of CotF is small, the likelihood of them being a powerful warg is also small.

5.Wargs may be necessary to control the others. They may either need to be very powerful or very numerous to do so.

6.The reason why no invasions of the others have occurred for such a long time could be the Children’s inability to control their armies. Or at least to control a large enough army. In this case the pact between the first men and the children was broken a long time ago, and the Children of the forest would have been planning humanity’s destruction the whole time.

7. If they don’t have their own Wargs anymore, their only chance would be to find a willing—or unwilling—warg, elsewhere. They may have lured Bloodraven in and then bound him to that weird maybe-hive-mind-network-treething in order to gain some control over him. This would explain why the Others have only been noted to be active for some decades before the story. They plan to do the same with Bran, who is probably a much more powerful Warg and therefor capable of controlling a much larger army.

8. If this is the case, Bran may figure out what is going on and try some kind of escape plan. As his plans would likely involve Hodor and his other friends the Children may kill them to trap Bran. Alternatively, Bran may also gain control over, or form a pact of some kind with the Others. If the children notice what Bran has done, they may come after him and his friends.

9. Overall, Bran’s chances of ever leaving that cave physically alive in his own body would be almost zero in any scenario where the children of the forest are his true enemies.

There are so many hints of falseness and impossibility especially in the final episode. Brans comments, the logic defying election, Tyrion not being in a book about the war of five Kings. I believe this goes beyond bad writing. The show is giving us hints that there is something very wrong and deceptive going on behind the scenes.

And what could that be. Well, I came up with three possible conclusions.

Possibility 1: This was my initial thought when I first beheld the show finale. The show replaced King Doran Martell with King Bran Stark. Because one generally spaced-out wheelchair guy is totally interchangeable with another. This seems like such a show thing to do. The showrunners outright tell us that the wheelchair is of Dornish design. Doran Martell makes sense from an election via council point of view, too. He’s an experienced ruler and notoriously passive and peaceful. That would be very appealing for the Lords of a war-torn Westeros. He’s also not the youngest or healthiest, so the more ambitious Lords could hope to replace him soon with the next election. And then there might be a point to the entire Dornish plotline, because Queen Arianne the Great is probably not not it.

Possibility 2: If Bran becomes King it does not have to occur while he is in his own body. His body is young, frail and broken and he is stuck in a cave in the middle of nowhere. Survival and escape will not be easy…so Bran Stark may truly never leave that cave. And yet his power, his despair and his great ambition may grant him another way. There are several characters who he could temporarily or entirely possess. As GRRM is infamous for putting his characters and his readers through hell this would likely happen to someone we care about, such as:

-Meera Reed. She is in Bran’s direct vicinity and for some reason the show wanted her to look like Jon Snow. Maybe because she was meant to be the host of his brother..? There is also that Varamir Sixskins chapter where he tries to skinchange into the woman who cared for him while he was in need. That could very well be foreshadowing.

-Davos Seaworth. He is in the north. As potential guardian/caretaker for Rickon he may wield considerable political influence in the north, at least for a time, and could therefor be useful to Bran. He’s also done nothing much useful in these final seasons. It must also be noted that GRRM once told Liam Cunningham that he’d sit on the Iron Throne in the end. Nothing has come of that. So King Bravos Maybe.

-Theon Greyjoy. He is also in the north and in Winterfell. His confused, weakened state may make him easier to possess, and Bran wouldn’t feel too bad about that. Theon’s broken state and bad reputation would reduce his usefulness, though.

-Benjen Stark: He also exists somewhere for some reason, and as a member of house Stark he may have a claim to Lordship. If he plays his cards right.

-Jon Snow. There is this currently unused corpse lying around. Very convenient. He may also have powerful claims and innate warg powers. What happens when a dying warg moves into the body of another warg? Potential immortality. According to some sources, GRRMs early drafts included a bitter rift between Jon Snow and Bran Stark and this could very well be it. When you take Brans abilities into account, it is likely that he has been watching Jon Snow for a while (the raven)- and in his point of view he might have seen how Jon continually fails to help his family while having the adventures and martial success that Bran himself desired. And that could very well dampen his affections for Jon Snow. It also means that the very first Stark scene of the show showing Jon teaching Bran would be the most bitter to re-watch. So very possible.

Possibility 3: The final episode had a very surreal fairytale-like feel to it. And as dreams and visions are a vital part of the series that could actually be true. If this is the case we have seen into Bran’s mind, seen his plans, his hopes and his interpretation of whatever visions he’s seen. Remember, Bran is a little kid who believes in fairytales and who does not always understand the adults around him. If we are seeing history – or some vision of history filtered by Bran’s hopes and perceptions, it would explain why everyone is such an idiot. Because everyone in Westeros has to be an idiot in order for Bran to become King. And if this episode is based on a vision, it could also turn out to be very wrong. Prophecies and visions are notoriously misleading and hard to interpret in ASoIaF.

If this is the case, we may have seen some metaphorical version of the true ending. So Jon shanking Dany could imply a political or military betrayal rather than him murdering her while the ashes rain and a single sigh escapes her lips. The entire tone of that scene does not really fit with the gritty realism that GoT generally goes for. It could belong into a dream/vision sequence though.

As most visions and prophecies in the books are vague and open to interpretation, so is this ending. It was all just a bad dream is also the most hopeful opinion I can offer on that finale.

So now you know how much I have to analyze and reinterpret the ending in order to be somewhat okay with it. Have fun with that.

Recent Posts

  • Dragonbinder the Hellhorn -a few questions
  • Joanna Lannister: a dream or a clue
  • Snow (the Show) or the problem with Bran 2.0
  • Daenerys Targaryen: Mad or mislearned
  • A tiny theory: The blue rose and house Tyrell

Archives

  • August 2023
  • August 2022
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • May 2020

Categories

  • A Frey Theory
  • Another review of the show ending
  • Daenerys Targaryen: Mad or mislearned
  • Dragon Horns
  • Joanna Lannister: Speculation about her purpose
  • Some random theory
Tweets by LateButterfly

Copyright © 2025 Stars-above-Westeros.

Theme: Oceanly by ScriptsTown

Privacy Policy